Iran says it is still waiting for an official U.S. response after President Trump rebuffed a cease-fire offer. Iran says it is still waiting for an official response from the United States, even after President Donald Trump rebuffed a cease-fire offer. According to Tehran, no formal reply has been delivered through official channels, despite Trump's public rejection of the proposal. Iranian officials have drawn a distinction between the president's rebuff and what they describe as an "official" U.S. position, indicating they do not consider the matter formally answered. The standoff leaves the status of the cease-fire offer unresolved. Trump has turned down the proposal, but Iran maintains it has yet to receive a definitive statement it regards as authoritative, keeping open the question of how Washington intends to proceed. As it stands, the two sides are describing the exchange in different terms. Trump treats the offer as answered by his rebuff, while Iran insists it is still awaiting a formal reply. That gap points to continued uncertainty over whether any pause in hostilities can be reached. For now, Iran's public posture is one of waiting. Tehran has signaled it wants a clear, official communication from the United States before drawing conclusions about the fate of the cease-fire offer. No further details on the terms of the proposal or the timing of any U.S. response have been made public. Iran, United States, Donald Trump, cease-fire, Middle East, US-Iran relations, diplomacy

News National

0 4 0

McDonald's is building its own advertising network, following Amazon and Walmart, and hopes it could grow into a $1 billion business. McDonald's said on Wednesday that it will build its own media network, selling advertising space across its restaurant system in a move that copies the playbook of retail giants Amazon and Walmart. The company made the announcement at its investor day, held at its Chicago headquarters. The program is already in a pilot phase. In August, 450 company-owned U.S. restaurants began showing advertisements for other companies on their digital drive-thru order boards. The pilot has not yet reached the franchisees who run most of the chain's roughly 14,000 U.S. locations. Even so, McDonald's said the venture could eventually become a $1 billion business. Morgan Flatley, the company's global chief marketing officer and executive vice president of new business ventures, framed the timing around a fast-expanding market. "Commerce media is one of the fastest-growing areas in advertising, and it's expected to reach more than $100 billion in the U.S. alone by 2028," she said during an investor presentation. Flatley described the appeal in blunt financial terms. "It's an opportunity to generate revenue for the system with little in the way of additional cost, no operational complexity and no disruption to our customer experience," she said. The potential for high-margin revenue arrives as McDonald's faces rising costs. Prices for key inputs such as beef are climbing, and the chain plans to spend billions of dollars on restaurant upgrades over the next decade. A steady advertising income stream could help offset those pressures. A first for the restaurant industry Within the restaurant business, McDonald's would be a pioneer in running its own media network. Chief Financial Officer Ian Borden told CNBC that the company's scale sets it apart from other advertisers. "We have one of the most valuable brands of any company of our size and scale in any industry," Borden said. He pointed to the chain's reach as its main advantage: "We serve about 85% of the U.S. population at least once a year, so we have reach that's quite unique, and we have 14,000 locations across the U.S., which means we're in every community, and we're connecting with every consumer." That reach is the core asset McDonald's is now trying to sell to advertisers. The drive-thru boards in the pilot put brand messages in front of customers at the point of purchase, a moment retailers have found valuable. What Amazon and Walmart have shown McDonald's is drawing on a model that has already proven lucrative for large retailers. Amazon reported $68.6 billion in advertising service sales in 2025, a figure that accounted for just under 10% of the company's total revenue. Amazon's ads appear across its shopping pages, on Prime Video, on its delivery lockers and on its live streaming platform Twitch, as well as on third-party apps and websites. Walmart has built a similar operation. The retailer does not disclose specific sales figures for its advertising arm, but it said Connect, its U.S. ad business, grew sales 43% in its fiscal second quarter. Walmart runs ads on its app, on its website and inside its more than 4,600 U.S. stores, and it also places them on outside platforms such as Instagram. In late 2024, Walmart bought television maker Vizio, a deal aimed partly at expanding its advertising business. These networks tend to be high-margin operations, which is a large part of their appeal. For McDonald's, the same logic applies: it can charge advertisers to use screens and space it already owns, without adding significant expense. The media network was not the only initiative McDonald's laid out at its investor day. Executives also detailed plans to lift sales through costly restaurant upgrades and improvements to food quality. The advertising venture, however, marks the company's clearest attempt yet to turn its enormous physical and customer footprint into a new source of revenue rather than relying solely on selling food. McDonald's media network, commerce media, McDonald's advertising, retail media, Morgan Flatley, Ian Borden, drive-thru ads, McDonald's investor day

News National

0 11 0

Manchester City have been found guilty of the majority of 115 financial charges. A points deduction now appears likely, though City are expected to appeal. An independent panel has found Manchester City guilty of the majority of the financial rule breaches contained in the 115 charges brought against the club, according to reports that emerged on 27 September 2026. The verdict came two years and 10 days after the hearing began, and 1,329 days after the charges were first laid. Neither the Premier League nor Manchester City announced the outcome. The news broke after The Athletic obtained details of the ruling. BBC Sport was subsequently told that the verdict had been sent to club executives during the week, and that those executives had to sign a non-disclosure agreement before they were allowed to open the file. Despite the leak, the Premier League has said nothing publicly. Manchester City did not confirm whether they had been found guilty. In a statement, the club said that from its point of view the "process remains ongoing", and an appeal is expected. City have consistently maintained that they have done nothing wrong. The finding of guilt does not close the case. Because the charges were denied, the matter must now proceed to a separate sanction hearing convened by the same independent panel. BBC Sport has been told that this hearing could still be months away, and that its result may not be made public until any appeal has been completed. What punishment City could face Everything is said to be on the table at the sanction stage. The panel can impose fines, points deductions or even demotion from the Premier League. Given the seriousness of the breaches, some form of points deduction now appears likely, though that remains subject to City's anticipated appeal. The case differs from that of Chelsea earlier this year. Chelsea self-reported and admitted guilt, which allowed the Stamford Bridge club to negotiate directly with the Premier League and reach a sanctioning agreement. City could still choose a similar route and attempt to agree terms, but for now they are contesting the outcome. Beyond any sporting penalty, there is also the prospect of other clubs pursuing City for compensation, adding a further layer of legal uncertainty to a saga that already shows no sign of a clean ending. Liverpool trip and an uncertain title race The ruling arrives with the season underway and the timing of any punishment still unknown. Enzo Maresca's side travel to Liverpool on 11 October, when the Premier League resumes after the international break. A win there could take City six points clear at the top of the table. That lead, however, now sits under a cloud. With guilt established but the sanction unresolved, and an appeal on the horizon, the value of City's on-field results has been thrown into question. The club, its supporters and the wider game are left waiting to learn what the penalty will be and when the case might finally reach a definitive conclusion. When and how any sanction is applied will matter not only to Manchester City but to the Premier League as a whole. Rather than marking the end of a long-running process, the verdict looks more like the end of the beginning, with further hearings, an appeal and possible compensation claims still to come. Manchester City, 115 charges, Premier League, points deduction, financial rules, Enzo Maresca, football verdict, sanction hearing

News National

0 4 0

Explore Bitcoin's 21 million supply cap, major holders, lost coins, mining schedule and the reality of global cryptocurrency scarcity.Bitcoin’s 21 Million Limit: Who Controls the Supply, How Many Coins Are Lost, and Why Scarcity Matters   An original News National article Bitcoin has a feature that separates it from almost every traditional currency: its supply is limited by design. No matter how much demand grows or how many investors enter the market, the Bitcoin network is programmed to issue no more than approximately 21 million coins. But the real story goes far beyond this number. Millions of Bitcoins are believed to be inaccessible, major financial institutions and corporations have accumulated substantial holdings, and the identity of the cryptocurrency's creator remains unknown. Meanwhile, the number of newly mined coins continues to decline as Bitcoin moves through its predetermined issuance schedule. These developments raise an important question for the global financial system: If Bitcoin is limited to 21 million coins, how much is actually available for people to own? This article examines Bitcoin's supply, major ownership groups, lost coins, institutional participation, and the economic implications of digital scarcity. 1. The 21 Million Bitcoin Rule: A Supply Unlike Traditional Money   Bitcoin's monetary system was designed around a fixed maximum supply. Its protocol gradually introduces new coins through a process known as mining, but the rate of issuance decreases over time. This is different from conventional currencies, where monetary supply can change through central-bank policies and other financial mechanisms. Bitcoin's issuance schedule is controlled by its software rules and the consensus of the network. Key Bitcoin supply facts Category Information Maximum supply Approximately 21 million BTC Mined supply More than 20 million BTC Remaining issuance Less than 1 million BTC Current block reward 3.125 BTC Approximate daily production 450 BTC Last halving April 2024 Next expected halving 2028 Estimated completion of issuance Around 2140 The figures describe Bitcoin's programmed issuance and should not be confused with the number of coins available for immediate purchase. Even after a Bitcoin has been mined, it may remain untouched in a wallet for years or become inaccessible if its private keys are lost. 2. Bitcoin Mining: Why New Supply Is Becoming Smaller   Bitcoin mining is the process through which specialised computers participate in securing the blockchain and validating transactions. Miners compete to add new blocks to the network. Successful miners receive a block reward, along with transaction fees. However, Bitcoin's issuance schedule includes an important mechanism called halving. Approximately every four years, the number of newly created Bitcoins awarded per block is cut in half. The April 2024 halving reduced the block reward from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC. Consequently, the network's approximate daily production fell from 900 Bitcoins to 450, assuming the usual block-production rate. This mechanism means that Bitcoin's new supply becomes progressively smaller, even as the network continues to operate. The final fractions of Bitcoin are expected to be issued around 2140, although the precise timing depends on block production and protocol conditions. 3. Satoshi Nakamoto: The Mystery Behind an Estimated 1.1 Million Bitcoins   Bitcoin was introduced by an individual or group using the name Satoshi Nakamoto. Despite the cryptocurrency's worldwide adoption, the creator's real identity has never been conclusively established. Blockchain researchers have estimated that Satoshi may have mined approximately 1.1 million Bitcoins during the network's early period. The estimate is based on patterns in early mining activity rather than a publicly verified declaration of ownership. These coins have attracted considerable attention because the associated addresses have not shown the kind of spending activity that would indicate their movement into the market. If the estimate is accurate, the holdings would represent a substantial proportion of Bitcoin's total supply. Nevertheless, inactive addresses do not prove that their owners have lost access to the coins. They may simply be choosing not to move them. The mystery surrounding Satoshi's holdings remains one of the most distinctive aspects of Bitcoin's history. 4. ETFs and Financial Institutions: Bitcoin Enters Traditional Investment Markets   Bitcoin's relationship with traditional finance has changed significantly with the introduction of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products. These investment vehicles allow investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin through familiar brokerage accounts, without necessarily managing cryptocurrency wallets themselves. The underlying assets are generally held by custodians on behalf of the funds. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust is one prominent example of this development. Its reported holdings demonstrate the scale at which traditional financial products can accumulate Bitcoin. Institutional participation has introduced a new category of demand into the market. However, fund holdings can change as investors purchase or redeem shares. It is also important to distinguish between Bitcoin held by an investment fund and Bitcoin permanently removed from circulation. Institutional holdings remain subject to trading and redemption activity. 5. Corporate Bitcoin Reserves: Why Businesses Are Accumulating Coins   Some corporations have adopted Bitcoin as a component of their treasury management strategies. Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, is among the most prominent companies associated with this approach. Rather than limiting its exposure to conventional cash and financial instruments, the company has accumulated Bitcoin as a major treasury asset. Other businesses have also disclosed cryptocurrency holdings, although their motivations and investment approaches vary. Corporate purchases can influence market demand, particularly when large quantities are acquired over a short period. However, corporate ownership does not make Bitcoin permanently unavailable. Companies may sell assets to meet financial obligations, adjust their balance sheets, or respond to changing market conditions. 6. Governments and National Bitcoin Holdings     Governments have become another important category of Bitcoin holders. Many state-controlled Bitcoin reserves originated through law-enforcement seizures, asset forfeitures, and other legal proceedings rather than direct market purchases. The United States, China, and the United Kingdom are among the countries associated with substantial government-controlled Bitcoin holdings. Bhutan has attracted attention for a different reason: its involvement in Bitcoin mining, supported by the country's energy resources. Government holdings can change as authorities adopt different policies concerning the management, retention, or disposal of digital assets. For this reason, government Bitcoin figures should be treated as time-sensitive estimates rather than permanent totals. 7. The Lost Bitcoin Crisis: Coins That May Never Be Recovered   Bitcoin's fixed supply creates an unusual problem: coins can become permanently inaccessible without disappearing from the blockchain. A Bitcoin wallet is controlled through cryptographic keys. If the necessary keys are lost and no usable backup exists, the owner may have no practical way to spend the funds. Researchers and industry participants have estimated that several million Bitcoins may be lost, although the exact number cannot be established with certainty. Some coins may belong to deceased individuals whose heirs cannot access their wallets. Others may be trapped in damaged devices or forgotten accounts. Two widely reported incidents illustrate the consequences. The 8,000 Bitcoin Hard Drive Lost in a Welsh Landfill   James Howells, a British IT engineer, reported that a hard drive containing access to approximately 8,000 Bitcoins was mistakenly discarded in 2013. The device was believed to have ended up at a landfill in Newport, Wales. Howells pursued legal efforts to recover the hard drive and proposed searching the landfill. However, the High Court dismissed his claim against Newport City Council in January 2025. The case attracted international attention because of the potential value of the missing cryptocurrency and the extraordinary difficulty of recovering a small electronic device from a large waste-disposal site. It also demonstrates that possessing a record of Bitcoin ownership is not enough when the necessary access credentials are missing. The Programmer With Two Password Attempts Remaining   Programmer Stefan Thomas became known for another unusual Bitcoin access problem. He reportedly holds an encrypted IronKey device containing the private keys associated with 7,002 Bitcoins. The device is configured to permanently lock and erase its contents after 10 incorrect password attempts. According to widely reported accounts, Thomas had already used eight attempts, leaving two remaining. His situation highlights an important distinction between the security and recoverability of digital assets. Strong encryption can protect a wallet from unauthorised access, but it can also prevent the legitimate owner from recovering funds after losing the password. 8. Bitcoin's Accessible Supply: Why the Real Number May Be Smaller Than 21 Million   The total number of Bitcoins ever issued is not necessarily the number that can realistically be purchased or transferred. A simplified illustration shows the difference: Supply measure Illustrative estimate Mined Bitcoin 20 million Potentially lost coins 3–4 million Potentially accessible coins 16–17 million These numbers are estimates, not verified market totals. The calculation does not establish how many coins are actively offered for sale, and some dormant coins may become accessible again. Furthermore, coins held by ETFs, companies, and governments are not automatically excluded from the available market. Their owners can decide to sell or transfer them. Nevertheless, the distinction between total supply and accessible supply is important when examining Bitcoin's economic characteristics. The effective supply available to buyers at a particular price can be much smaller than the total number of coins that exist. 9. Sixty Million Millionaires Versus Bitcoin's Limited Supply   The relationship between worldwide wealth and Bitcoin's limited issuance offers an interesting mathematical perspective. Consider a hypothetical situation involving 60 million millionaires and an accessible Bitcoin supply of 17–18 million coins. If every millionaire wanted to acquire one complete Bitcoin, the available supply would be insufficient. The hypothetical supply calculation Global millionaires 60 million Accessible BTC 17–18 million BTC per millionaire 0.28–0.30 Potential one-BTC allocation 28%–30% Illustrative mathematical comparison, not a prediction of actual ownership or investment demand. This scenario assumes that every millionaire wants Bitcoin and that the entire estimated accessible supply is available for distribution. Real-world ownership is more complicated. Wealth levels differ considerably, individuals have different investment preferences, and Bitcoin can be divided into smaller units. The calculation is useful for understanding the scale of the supply constraint, but it should not be interpreted as evidence that every millionaire will seek to purchase Bitcoin. 10. What Would Equal Bitcoin Ownership Look Like Across Eight Billion People?   Bitcoin's divisibility allows people to own a fraction of a coin. One BTC is equivalent to 100 million satoshis, enabling transactions and ownership far below the value of a whole Bitcoin. If 17 million Bitcoins were divided equally among a hypothetical global population of eight billion people, each person would receive approximately 0.002125 BTC, or 212,500 satoshis. This is a mathematical illustration rather than a realistic distribution model. Actual ownership is determined by purchases, transfers, savings, institutional activity, and individual financial circumstances. It nevertheless demonstrates how a fixed supply can be distributed in fractional amounts across a large population. 11. Does Limited Supply Mean Bitcoin Prices Must Rise?   Bitcoin's limited issuance is frequently discussed in connection with its long-term market value. However, a fixed supply does not guarantee that its price will increase. Market prices depend on several interacting factors: Demand: The number of people and institutions seeking exposure to Bitcoin. Liquidity: The quantity of coins available for trading at different prices. Regulation: Laws governing ownership, exchanges, custody, and financial products. Investor sentiment: Changing expectations about cryptocurrency markets. Macroeconomic conditions: Interest rates, inflation, currency movements, and broader financial trends. Network security: The economic incentives supporting miners and transaction validation. Bitcoin has experienced substantial price increases as well as sharp declines throughout its history. Its issuance schedule is predetermined, but future market demand, adoption, and valuation remain uncertain. For investors, the distinction between a scarce asset and a guaranteed profitable investment is particularly important. 12. Bitcoin's Long-Term Future: What Happens When Mining Rewards Approach Zero?   Bitcoin's mining rewards will continue to decline through future halving events. As the block subsidy becomes smaller, transaction fees are expected to play an increasingly important role in compensating miners. This transition raises questions about the long-term economics of mining, network security, transaction costs, and the sustainability of the system. The final stages of Bitcoin issuance are expected to extend toward approximately 2140, although miners will continue validating transactions beyond the point when new Bitcoin issuance effectively ends. The network's future will depend not only on the scarcity of its coins but also on its continued use, security, technical development, and economic incentives. Conclusion: Bitcoin's Scarcity Is About More Than Its 21 Million Limit Bitcoin's supply cap is one of the most distinctive features of its design, but the actual ownership landscape is considerably more complex. The estimated holdings associated with Satoshi Nakamoto, the expansion of institutional investment products, corporate treasury strategies, government reserves, and potentially lost coins all contribute to the distribution of existing Bitcoin. With more than 20 million coins already mined, the remaining issuance represents a relatively small portion of the maximum supply. Yet scarcity alone cannot determine the cryptocurrency's future value. Demand, market liquidity, regulation, technological developments, and investor behaviour will continue to shape its role in the global financial system.

News National

0 2 0

Uttar Pradesh will require every sweet shop to display a 'Use by Date' from October 15, covering loose sweets for the first time. FSDA also bans two coolant chemicals in milk units. Uttar Pradesh will require every sweet sold across the state to carry a visible "Use by Date" from October 15, the state's Food Safety and Drug Administration (FSDA) Department has ruled. The order matters most for loose sweets, which until now carried no compulsory expiry marking, officials said on Sunday. The directive was issued by Dr Roshan Jacob, Commissioner of the FSDA Department. It applies to all sweets kept in storage or put on display for sale, whether packaged or sold loose. Department inspections at sweet-making units and retail counters found that buyers were often left without clear details on when a product was made or when it should be eaten by. Without that information, the FSDA said, shoppers cannot judge how fresh a sweet is or how long it will keep. Shelf life varies widely by product. According to the department, some sweets last just a single day while others stay good for up to 30 days, with taste, quality and freshness declining as time passes. Marking the date, officials argue, tells buyers exactly how long they have to safely finish the item. Under the rules in place before this order, expiry or "Use by Date" labelling was already compulsory only for packaged sweets. Loose sweets had no equivalent requirement, leaving a gap the new measure is meant to close. The department framed the change as a push for greater openness in the confectionery trade. The FSDA also announced a separate ban on the use of ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in units that process milk and milk products. Inspections had turned up establishments using the two chemicals as coolants during steps such as pasteurisation and refrigeration. The agency warned that both substances carry serious health dangers if they reach food, and said the ban was ordered because a leak in processing equipment could let the coolants seep into milk. It pointed to propylene glycol as a safer substitute, noting that many milk processors already rely on it. Uttar Pradesh sweets, Use by Date, FSDA, loose sweets expiry, Roshan Jacob, food safety UP, ethylene glycol milk, sweet shelf life

News National

0 2 0

Fast-fashion retailer Shein prepares for its first public earnings report as questions mount over slowing growth. Fast-fashion giant Shein is heading into its first public earnings test, a milestone that will hand investors and analysts their clearest look yet at the company's finances at a moment when its rapid expansion is showing signs of strain. The report marks a turning point for the retailer, which built its business on low-cost clothing sold directly to shoppers online. Until now, Shein has operated largely outside the glare of public financial disclosure. That is set to change as the company opens its books to fresh scrutiny. The timing is difficult. Concerns about slowing growth have been building around the retailer, raising the stakes for a debut set of results that will be measured closely for any evidence that its momentum is fading. For a company that grew quickly by undercutting rivals on price and speed, the earnings test carries added weight. Investors will be watching to see whether Shein can sustain the pace that made it one of the most talked-about names in online retail. The outcome of the report is likely to shape how markets view Shein's next phase, as it moves from a fast-growing private operator into a business held to the standards of public financial reporting. Shein, Shein earnings, fast fashion, Shein growth, online retail, e-commerce, Shein IPO, retail earnings

News National

0 3 0

A Louisiana appeals court upheld a $15,000 award and boundary ruling after neighbors clashed over a 70-foot timber strip, lights, generators and a dead cow. A Louisiana appeals court has settled a bitter neighbor feud in Union Parish, ruling that the true property line between two families sits at an old fallen wire fence and ordering the couple who sparked the fight to pay $15,000 in damages. The Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal issued its decision on January 14, 2026, backing an earlier district court judgment. The case pitted Jesse Justin Colvin and his wife, Ruby Sue Hill Colvin, against their neighbors, Robert Bradford Jones and Roni Michelle Reppond Jones. Under the ruling in consolidated docket numbers 56,654-CA and 56,655-CA, each Colvin must pay $7,500 to the Joneses. The court also permanently barred the couple from causing any further trouble along the shared boundary. The two properties lie near Farmerville. Jesse and Ruby Colvin purchased a 23-acre tract along Highway 828 on July 12, 2012, and built their main home there. On March 25, 2014, Robert and Roni Jones bought an adjoining one-acre lot on Linville Fire Tower Road. For over a decade, the couples got along as friends. That goodwill collapsed over a 70-foot-deep band of trees and brush between the two lots. The Colvins insisted the strip fell entirely within their northern line, pointing to surveys done in 1989 and 2012. The Joneses countered that the genuine historic edge ran along an old combination wire fence set farther south. Signs, lights and a rotting carcass As the Joneses pressed their claim to the wooded ground, the Colvins posted "NO TRESPASSING" signs along the surveyed line, then swapped them for larger ones. The confrontation grew steadily uglier. The Colvins strung orange construction fencing across the contested area and pointed high-intensity lights toward the Joneses' home, including their backyard. They also ran noisy power generators through the night, from dusk until dawn, and left a dead cow beside the survey marker close to the boundary. The trial court later concluded that these acts served no genuine purpose and badly disrupted the Joneses' ability to live peacefully at home. The litigation opened on September 8, 2023, when the Colvins sued in the Third Judicial District Court for the Parish of Union, asking a judge to fix the boundary. The Joneses filed their own demands, seeking a permanent injunction and monetary compensation. They accused the Colvins of repeated intimidation that interfered with the use of their property. Judge sides with the Joneses After a bench trial, District Judge Monique Babin Clement ruled for the Joneses. She placed the legal line at the old combination fence rather than the newer surveyed line, and ordered the Colvins to strip away the signs, posts, lights and flagging materials. She held Jesse Colvin liable for $7,500 to each neighbor, totaling $15,000. The Colvins took the matter to the Second Circuit, challenging the boundary finding, the injunction and the damages. A three-judge panel of Judges Hunter, Marcotte and Ellender turned aside every argument and affirmed the lower court. The panel explained that pinpointing a contested boundary is a question of fact. Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 786, a line may be established through evidence of long possession when ownership cannot otherwise be proven. Testimony showed that earlier owners of the Colvin tract had long treated the old wire fence as the working border. Jesse Colvin himself conceded under questioning that he had never set foot in the disputed northern area before the fight began. He had never grazed livestock or felled trees there, and said he ordered the 2022 survey because he did not know where his line lay. He also acknowledged that his grandchildren drove steel posts along the surveyed line. The court found no error in resting the boundary on the physical evidence and history of use. Damages stand on appeal The Second Circuit likewise upheld the $15,000 award and the permanent injunction, finding the trial record amply supported the judge's conclusions about the Colvins' behavior. That record covered the oversized signs, the carcass, the construction fencing, the glaring lights and the droning generators aimed at the Joneses' home. The Colvins argued the Joneses had endured nothing worse than a minor nuisance, with no medical, physical or financial harm. The judges rejected that view. Louisiana law weighs whether an activity inflicts real harm or merely a small annoyance, considering the neighborhood's character, the degree of intrusion and the impact on health and safety. Lasting distress, broken sleep, anxiety and lost enjoyment of one's property, the court held, can qualify as genuine damage. It found no abuse of discretion in the award and no flaw in the injunction. Louisiana property dispute, Union Parish boundary case, Second Circuit Court of Appeal, neighbor harassment lawsuit, timberland property line, Farmerville Louisiana, $15,000 damages ruling, Louisiana Civil Code Article 786

News National

0 3 0

The UN Population Fund reports a 123% jump in early and forced marriage cases in Gaza in the second quarter of 2026, warning of eroded social structures. Reports of violence against women and girls in the Gaza Strip have climbed steeply, with a marked jump in early and forced marriages, according to a set of recent findings from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA). One study, drawing on data gathered by 10 separate organisations, concluded that the drawn-out emergency in the territory has produced circumstances where women and girls confront mounting dangers of gender-based violence. The same report flagged what it called a "severe escalation" in cases of early and forced marriage during the second quarter of 2026. The UNFPA said reported incidents of such marriages rose 123% compared with the first quarter. Early or child marriage, as recorded in the findings, involved girls between the ages of 12 and 17. Both forced marriage and child marriage fall under the UN's definition of gender-based violence. The agency acknowledged that pinning down exact numbers is difficult, given the conditions on the ground. Even so, Nestor Owomuhangi, the UNFPA representative to Palestine, described the pattern as deeply alarming. He said three years of extreme hardship - during which tens of thousands have died and repeated waves of displacement have swept the population - have dismantled the community's foundations, leaving what he characterised as a total absence of any functioning system. Testimony from the camps A second report compiled accounts from 230 women sheltering in overcrowded displacement sites in Gaza City and Khan Younis. The testimony is stark. One woman staying in a school converted into a shelter described how survivors of rape are frequently wed to the men who attacked them, a move families make to head off disgrace. She said that when assaults come to light inside the schools, marriage ceremonies and celebrations follow there the very next day. Another account recalled the period of famine the previous year, when a father handed over his 14-year-old daughter in marriage in return for two sacks of flour, allowing him to feed himself and his remaining children. Six women across different camps recounted similar transactions - arrangements the report noted would have been inconceivable before hostilities between Israel and Hamas erupted in 2023. Collapsed services and closed schools The conditions behind these accounts remain severe. Food markets have started operating again, yet many families cannot pay for what is on sale, and deep poverty and hunger persist alongside dependence on aid handouts. Almost the entire population of more than two million people has been forced from home, with most now sheltering in makeshift tent settlements or damaged structures. Around 1.2 million Palestinians are living in tents or improvised shelters. Public services have largely broken down, and Israeli air strikes have carried on despite the ceasefire. Education has been badly disrupted. Before the war, girls in Gaza both outnumbered and outscored boys at every stage of schooling beyond primary level. Extended closures have since pushed many children out of the classroom altogether. Boys face pressure to take on informal work to help support their households, while for girls the central concern has become personal safety. Living packed together among strangers, without privacy, in a socially conservative setting, women and girls report rising sexual harassment and abuse. Many families now regard marrying off their daughters as a means of shielding them and safeguarding their reputation. The UNFPA findings were based on research conducted in late 2025 and early 2026. Gaza violence against women, UNFPA report, forced marriage Gaza, gender-based violence, child marriage Gaza, Gaza displacement camps, Nestor Owomuhangi, Palestine humanitarian crisis

News National

0 12 0

Lava Virat Curve 5G, Poco M8 Power and Vivo T5 Lite 5G compared on price in India, battery, display, chipset and cameras. Lava has launched the Virat Curve 5G in India, a phone built around a 6,000mAh battery and a MediaTek Dimensity 7100 chipset. It sits in the sub-Rs. 25,000 segment and is listed at Rs. 23,999 for the 6GB RAM and 128GB storage configuration, in Ellora Slate, Heritage Indigo and Makrana Ivory colours. The device lands against two established rivals in the same price band: the Poco M8 Power and the Vivo T5 Lite 5G. The Poco M8 Power starts at Rs. 24,999 for its 6GB and 128GB variant, with an 8GB and 128GB option at Rs. 27,999, sold in Black, Blaze Orange and Green. The Vivo T5 Lite 5G is the cheapest of the three, starting at Rs. 19,999 for a 4GB and 128GB base model, rising to Rs. 21,999 for 6GB and 128GB and Rs. 24,999 for 6GB and 256GB, in Twilight Shadow and Wave Blue. Displays and software The Lava Virat Curve 5G carries a 6.75-inch full-HD+ AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and runs Android 16. It also includes a rear display that shows notifications, battery status, time and emojis. The Poco M8 Power uses a larger 6.90-inch full-HD+ panel, also at 120Hz, protected by Gorilla Glass 7i, and runs Android 16 with HyperOS 3. The Vivo T5 Lite 5G takes a different route. Its 6.74-inch display runs at 120Hz but is limited to HD+ resolution, and it uses an LCD panel rather than AMOLED. Software is OriginOS 6 based on Android 16. Among the trio, only the Lava and Poco models offer AMOLED screens. Chipsets and battery The Lava Virat Curve 5G pairs its Dimensity 7100 chipset with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, and its 6,000mAh battery supports 45W charging. The Poco M8 Power runs on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 4 Gen 4, offers up to 8GB of RAM with 128GB storage, and holds the largest cell of the three at 8,000mAh, also with 45W fast charging. The Vivo T5 Lite 5G is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 and comes with 4GB or 6GB of RAM alongside 128GB or 256GB of storage. Its 6,500mAh battery supports 44W FlashCharge. That places battery capacity in Poco's favour, with Vivo second and Lava third, while charging speeds are close across all three. Cameras and build On the back, the Lava Virat Curve 5G has a 50-megapixel rear camera and a 13-megapixel selfie camera. It measures 162.26 x 73.51 x 8.55mm, weighs about 206 grams and carries an IP64 rating for dust and water resistance. The Poco M8 Power uses a dual rear setup led by a 50-megapixel primary sensor with a secondary camera. It is the largest and heaviest here at 169.70 x 79.14 x 8.40mm and 225 grams, with an IP65-rated build. The Vivo T5 Lite 5G also has a 50-megapixel main sensor, joined by a 0.08-megapixel secondary sensor and a 5-megapixel front camera. It measures 167.40 x 77.10 x 8.39mm, weighs 209 grams and shares the IP65 rating. Where each phone fits The three phones cluster at similar prices but pull in different directions. The Poco M8 Power leans on its 8,000mAh battery and the largest screen in the group, making it the pick for buyers who want the most capacity and display area. The Vivo T5 Lite 5G is the least expensive and offers a 6,500mAh battery with an IP65 build, though its display is held back by HD+ resolution. The Lava Virat Curve 5G stakes its case on a higher-resolution AMOLED display and the Dimensity 7100 platform, backed by the added rear display for glanceable information. Buyers weighing screen quality and chipset against raw battery size have a clear split to consider across the three models. Lava Virat Curve 5G, Poco M8 Power, Vivo T5 Lite 5G, phone comparison India, 5G phones under 25000, AMOLED display phones, smartphone price India

News National

0 3 0

India's National Stock Exchange is valued at 43 times earnings, a multiple that sits well above comparable stock exchanges around the world. India's National Stock Exchange (NSE) is being valued at 43 times its earnings, a level that stands well above what comparable exchanges command in other markets. The price-to-earnings multiple of 43 places NSE at a premium to its global peers. On this measure, investors are paying far more for each rupee of the exchange's profit than they typically pay for a share in stock exchanges elsewhere in the world. A price-to-earnings ratio compares a company's share price with its per-share profit. A higher figure means the market is assigning a richer valuation. At 43 times earnings, NSE's multiple is a clear outlier when set against exchanges outside India. The gap between NSE's valuation and that of its international counterparts is the central point of comparison. Where peer exchanges trade at lower multiples, NSE's figure marks it out as one of the most expensively valued operators in its category. NSE is India's largest stock exchange by trading volume. Its elevated valuation multiple has drawn attention as a marker of how the market is pricing the business relative to established exchanges abroad. NSE valuation, National Stock Exchange, 43 times earnings, price to earnings ratio, global stock exchanges, NSE IPO, Indian stock market, exchange peers

News National

0 3 0

Hamas accuses the US-created Board of Peace of siding with Israel after it ruled out any role for the UN refugee agency UNRWA in Gaza. Hamas on Saturday denounced a decision by the US-created Board of Peace to shut the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, out of operations in Gaza. Spokesperson Hazem Qassem said the move amounted to "a complete alignment with the Zionist [Israeli] position" and was designed to shut down the agency, cut off its aid to Palestinians and erase their right of return. The rebuke followed a statement the Board posted on X on Friday. It said UNRWA's standing in Gaza remained the same and that it would cooperate only with "trusted partners who will deliver for the people of Gaza and contribute to a deradicalized Strip". The agency, the Board added, "fails on those litmus tests". Qassem called it odd that the body would take such a combative line against UNRWA while, in his words, failing to get aid into Gaza or to force Israel to honour the ceasefire and stop the daily killing of Palestinians there. UNRWA was established in 1949 and has spent decades running aid and schooling programmes for Palestinian refugees. Palestinians regard it as a guardian of their claim to return to their homeland. Israel has pushed for the agency to be shut down entirely. What the Board told the UN The Board of Peace briefed the UN General Assembly on Wednesday and listed several UN bodies as partners in its plans for Gaza. UNRWA was left off that list. Its public position, however, appears firmer than its private dealings. The Associated Press reported on Friday that Board members had shown more openness to working with UNRWA away from public view. A Board official, who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity, said members had sat down with UNRWA representatives on several occasions. The official suggested the agency's programmes might carry on if they genuinely helped Gaza's residents, but insisted that "UNRWA's days are over". The Board has installed a Palestinian technocratic committee to administer Gaza. Philippe Lazzarini, who ran UNRWA until earlier this year, told the AP that members of that committee wanted to keep the agency involved. Lazzarini's warning on winter Lazzarini turned on the Board directly on Thursday, saying it had not lived up to what it was set up to do. In a post on X, he said Israeli authorities were still holding back basic supplies "as part of a wider plan to keep Gaza unlivable for Palestinians". "Grandiose plans is what the Board of Peace does best," he wrote. "Plans however will not keep the people of Gaza warm this winter." He called for Gaza's crossings to be reopened and for aid to enter in large volumes. The dispute over who governs Gaza's relief effort played out against continued bloodshed on the ground. Gaza's Ministry of Health said Israeli attacks killed seven Palestinians across the territory over the previous 48 hours. One of the dead had earlier been wounded and later died of those injuries. Reports of further strikes came from northern Gaza. The standoff leaves the future of the largest aid provider in Gaza unresolved. UNRWA continues to run services on the ground, including schools that reopened for the new academic year, even as the body now tasked with steering Gaza's recovery signals it intends to build a relief network without it. Hamas UNRWA, Board of Peace Gaza, UNRWA Gaza role, Hazem Qassem, Philippe Lazzarini, Gaza aid, Palestinian right of return, Gaza ceasefire

News National

0 12 0

A recruiter's TikTok warning against bringing iced coffee to interviews has split workers over etiquette, sexism and a shrinking job market. A short video posted to TikTok has turned a cup of iced coffee into a workplace flashpoint. US recruiter Caitlin Wehniainen told candidates not to "waltz into your interview all casual with an iced coffee", arguing that it makes the meeting look like "just a stop on your list of errands for the day". She said her Gen Z applicants were increasingly showing up drink in hand, and that it read as if they "didn't have time to finish your coffee beforehand". Wehniainen has since called the reaction the "Great Iced Coffee Debate of 2026". Supporters of her view treat arriving with an iced matcha latte as a cardinal sin - unprofessional, too informal and a distraction. Critics say the fuss is an overreaction that ignores how hard it has become simply to land an interview. The recruiter later softened her message in a LinkedIn post. "I was never saying that bringing coffee makes someone a bad candidate," she wrote. "My point was simply about avoiding distractions." The online argument has drawn in workers with sharply different views. Hanad, 28, who works for an energy supplier in London, likes iced coffee but would leave it at the door. "A job interview is all about first impressions," he said. "Anything can deter the employer from employing you." He described iced coffee as a teenage drink that "would look immature and too informal", and said he would avoid an energy drink for the same reason. Water or a hot coffee, in his view, would pass. His colleague Tsvetina, 24, disagreed. She argued that a candidate should not be judged on what they carry or how they dress. "I think we should be moving away from these traditional corporate stigmas," she said. "What matters is what the person is actually communicating during the interview." Aisha, 28, went further and said she would happily bring one along. "I think it shows that I have come early enough to get iced coffee," she said. A fizzy drink would be a step too far, but she believes employers want to see personality. Showing some, she said, "makes you stand out from other people who are coming for the job". A question of gender For some, the row is about more than manners. Katy, 25, a personal assistant working in events, said she would not take an iced coffee to an interview herself, but she sees a bias in the criticism. She called the controversy "a bit sexist, because it's usually girls who drink iced coffee". Her point was pointed: "If it was a hot coffee, which is more masculine, there wouldn't be a discourse about that." That framing has resonated because the drink has become closely associated with young women, making it an easy target for judgements about professionalism that a mug of black coffee would escape. The debate, in other words, may say as much about who is being scrutinised as about what is in the cup. A shrinking market for young workers The intensity of the argument sits against a bleak backdrop for the people it concerns most. The number of graduate vacancies in the UK has almost halved over the past year, as employers cut entry-level positions in favour of artificial intelligence and try to contain rising costs. Roughly one in eight people aged 16 to 24 are now classed as Neets - not in education, employment or training. The pressure is not confined to Britain. Young workers in the United States are also contending with a tight labour market as hiring slows, leaving early-career candidates competing for a shrinking pool of openings. Recruiters who work with younger applicants say the stakes are high enough that few would risk anything seen as a misstep. Lucy Cooper, founder of the London design and branding recruitment firm Spark, said her corner of the market - marketing - is "really tough right now". She added that she does not know of any Gen Z candidate who would take the chance. That caution is the thread running through the whole dispute. For a generation facing fewer openings and stiffer competition, even a drink order can feel like a decision with consequences. Whether an iced coffee genuinely costs anyone a job is unproven, but the readiness of both candidates and recruiters to weigh in shows how much a first impression still matters when jobs are scarce. iced coffee job interview, Caitlin Wehniainen, interview etiquette, Gen Z job market, graduate vacancies UK, Neets, recruitment, AI hiring

News National

0 3 0