Language Settings
Select Website Language

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Madras High Court Upholds Resignations of Six AIADMK MLAs

2 hours ago

3

0

Madras High Court Upholds Resignations of Six AIADMK MLAs, Orders Disqualification Cases to Finish in Two Months

By News National Editorial Team

Chennai, October 13, 2026: The Madras High Court has upheld the Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker’s decision to accept the resignations of six former AIADMK legislators who subsequently joined the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The court also directed the Speaker to complete pending disqualification proceedings involving four of the legislators within two months.

The ruling, delivered by a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan, addresses a dispute over whether the Speaker could accept the legislators’ resignations while anti-defection proceedings remained pending.

The court treated resignation from the Assembly and disqualification under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution as separate processes. It held that the acceptance of the resignations did not automatically end the pending disqualification proceedings.

Why the case reached the High Court

The six legislators had resigned from the AIADMK and later joined TVK. Reports said they had also cross-voted in favour of the TVK government during a confidence motion.

AIADMK representatives challenged the Speaker’s decision, arguing that the resignations should not have been accepted before the disqualification proceedings were decided. The dispute raised questions about the relationship between an elected legislator’s right to resign and the Assembly’s responsibility to address alleged defection.

The Speaker defended the decision on the grounds that resignations should be accepted when they are genuine and voluntary, and that pending disqualification proceedings do not necessarily prevent that step.

Disqualification proceedings must continue

The High Court upheld the Speaker’s acceptance of the resignations but made clear that the outstanding disqualification cases must still be decided. It directed the Speaker to complete those proceedings within two months.

The direction is significant because it separates the question of whether a legislator has resigned voluntarily from the question of whether their conduct attracts the Constitution’s anti-defection provisions.

The ruling does not mean the four pending disqualification cases have already been decided. Their outcomes will depend on the proceedings and the Speaker’s final determinations, subject to applicable law and judicial review.

Political implications for Tamil Nadu

The decision is a setback for the AIADMK’s legal challenge and provides support for the Speaker’s handling of the resignations. It also leaves an important legal process unresolved, because the pending disqualification matters remain active.

The broader implications will depend on the final decisions in those proceedings and any further legal steps taken by the parties.

Sources

  1. The Indian Express — Madras High Court upholds resignations of six AIADMK MLAs who joined TVK, October 13, 2026

  2. The Times of India — Madras High Court upholds Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker’s decision to accept resignations of six AIADMK MLAs, October 13, 2026

Editorial note: Obtain and review the full court judgment before adding detailed quotations or legal analysis. The two-month deadline concerns the pending disqualification proceedings; it is not a deadline for the legislators’ resignations to take effect.

Click here to Read More
Previous Article
భారత్‌–కెనడా వ్యూహాత్మక భాగస్వామ్యం 2030 నాటికి వాణిజ్యం రెట్టింపు లక్ష్యం
Next Article
Goa Fills 83% of Government Primary-Teacher Vacancies

Related Chennai Updates:

Are you sure? You want to delete this comment..! Remove Cancel

Comments (0)

    Leave a comment